Last month, I was at an
event at the Mumbai Literary Fest where Ramachandra Guha made 2 strong (and
mildly controversial) assertions
- Anil Kumble won India more matches than Sachin Tendulkar
- Anil Kumble would have made a better captain than Sourav Ganguly
Maybe it was because he came from my home state, Karnataka. Maybe it was because he held a degree in Mechanical Engineering from one of Karnataka’s best engineering colleges, RVCE. Maybe it was because he acted and bowled like a tear-away fast bowler (something Indian cricket fans sorely missed) – glaring at the batsmen and wiping out tails. Maybe it was because he once bowled with a broken jaw.
While the second assertion made above is tougher to verify, I decided to spend some time digging through the data to verify the first assertion.
Methodology
I looked at all of India’s
test victories in the period 1993-2008 in which both Sachin and Kumble played.
For each game, I identified the top 3 batsmen and top 3 bowlers in the team who
contributed to the victory. For rank-ordering the batsmen, I simply looked at
the total number of runs scored in the game (first + second innings). For rank-ordering
the bowlers, I assigned 3 points for each top order wicket, 2 points for each
wicket-keeper’s/all-rounder’s wicket and 1 point for each tail-ender’s wicket.
I then calculated a
cumulative score to assess each player’s value by assigning 3 points for games
in which they were the best batsman/bowler, 2 points for games in which they
were second-best and 1 point for games in which they were third-best. The
assumption made for this scoring system is that scoring runs and taking wickets
are both equally critical to success in test cricket (hence the same scale).
While one could argue that the 3-2-1 scale itself is arbitrary (i.e the
relative importance of a player’s performance is not always linear), I believe
it is at least indicative of the importance of a player to the team.
Results
Sachin and Kumble played
together in 40 Indian victories – 28 at home and 12 away. Their contribution to
the team in these victories is given in the tables below. As per my cumulative
score scale, Kumble beats Sachin 90 to
50. Surprisingly, Kumble’s contribution in Away wins is also superior.
I also did the same analyses for Sachin, Dravid and Kumble. They played together in 29 Test wins. Shockingly, Kumble’s contribution (63) equals that of Sachin and Dravid combined (64)!
However, in a country
gifted with abundant batting riches but a paucity of quality bowlers, our test
team misses King Kumble more than we miss God Sachin. And it is time we recognize
his contribution to Indian cricket.
PS: One could argue that
batsmen only get one chance for a mistake while bowlers can make several leading
to greater variability in performance, but maybe that only goes to reinforce
the importance of good bowlers in tests. Furthermore, one could argue that
India’s poor bowling resources gave Kumble more opportunities to pick up
wickets. But again, that only reinforces how critical he was to our success.
PPS: In a future blogpost, I will analyse drawn games in which Sachin performed well, but India failed to close out the win due to a poor performance by Kumble and the bowlers.
Backup data and analysis: https://www.dropbox.com/s/r6d369yzydqz0va/Sachin%20vs%20Kumble%20vs%20Dravid.xlsx?dl=0
PPS: In a future blogpost, I will analyse drawn games in which Sachin performed well, but India failed to close out the win due to a poor performance by Kumble and the bowlers.
Backup data and analysis: https://www.dropbox.com/s/r6d369yzydqz0va/Sachin%20vs%20Kumble%20vs%20Dravid.xlsx?dl=0